Available:*
Library | Item Barcode | Call Number | Material Type | Item Category 1 | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Searching... | 30000010334164 | S494.5.B563 R46 2012 | Open Access Book | Book | Searching... |
On Order
Summary
Summary
Agri-food bio-technology policy and regulation is transitioning from an early period focused on genetic engineering technologies to 'next-generation' rules and regulatory processes linked to challenges originating in a wide variety of new technological processes and applications. Can lessons learned from past and current regulatory oversights of agricultural biotechnology - and other high-technology sectors - help us address new and emerging regulatory challenges in the agri-food genetics sector?
The expert contributors in this volume discuss the experiences of a wide range of North American, European and Asian countries with high technology regulation to address four key questions related to the past and future development of agri-food genomics regulation across the globe.
how unique is agri-food biotechology regulation, and how can it be evaluated using the existing tools of regulatory analysis developed in examinations of other sectors? is a 'government to governance' model of regulatory regime development found in many other sectors relevant in this rapidly evolving sphere of activity? is a stages model of regulatory regime development accurate? And, if so, at which stage are we currently positioned in the regulation of agri-food genomics products and technologies? what drives movement between stages in different countries and sectors? In assessing such drivers, what are the key links between sectoral (meso) developments and more general macro and micro developments such as international relations and administrative behaviour?By updating, extending and challenging earlier empirical and theoretical social science perspectives on agricultural bio-technological regulation, this volume helps to inform future policy formulation. It will be of interest to practitioners and students of biotechnology, agriculture, and science and technology policy, and regulatory processes more generally.
Author Notes
Michael Howlett is Burnaby Mountain Chair in the Department of Political Science at Simon Fraser University, and specializes in public policy analysis and resource and environmental policy. He has authored or edited over 20 volumes, including most recently Canadian Public Policy (2012) and the Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (2012).
David Laycock is Professor in the Department of Political Science at Simon Fraser University, and focuses his research on political ideologies, democratic theory, Canadian party politics, public policy, and the politics of biotechnology. His published work includes Policy Analysis in Canada (2007), Representation and Democratic Theory (2004).
Reviews 1
Choice Review
It is estimated that crops produced through biotechnology applications are grown by 16.7 million farmers in 29 countries. From 1994 to 2010, the amount of land cultivated with biotechnology crops went from zero to approximately 400 million hectares. Agricultural animals produced by biotechnology are beginning to show a similar increase. Concerns about the possible environmental and health-related dangers of biotechnology food products have led to many governmental regulations/rules about the development, farming, and use of the crop plants. This book evaluates the rationale for early regulations and then prescribes strategies for developing future regulations that better ensure sensible applications of the technology. It begins with an overview of agricultural biotechnology policies. The work then evaluates how policies are developed and investigates regulatory practices in various nations. Lessons learned from current policies form the next section of the book. It concludes with a discussion of policy models for the future growth of agricultural biotechnology; these models would involve soliciting input on bioethical concerns from advocacy groups and the general public. Each chapter is written by an authority in the subject area and includes ample up-to-date references. The coverage is unbiased and argues from contemporary public policy perspectives. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through professionals in law/public policy or agricultural biotechnology. B. R. Shmaefsky Lone Star College - Kingwood
