Skip to:Content
|
Bottom
Cover image for Sustainable building adaptation : innovations in decision-making
Title:
Sustainable building adaptation : innovations in decision-making
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
Chichester, West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons, 2014
Physical Description:
xvi, 277 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
ISBN:
9781118477106

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010334235 TH880 W554 2014 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

How to adapt existing building stock is a problem being addressed by local and state governments worldwide. In most developed countries we now spend more on building adaptation than on new construction and there is an urgent need for greater knowledge and awareness of what happens to commercial buildings over time.

Sustainable Building Adaptation: innovations in decision-making is a significant contribution to understanding best practice in sustainable adaptations to existing commercial buildings by offering new knowledge-based theoretical and practical insights. Models used are grounded in results of case studies conducted within three collaborative construction project team settings in Australia and the Netherlands, and exemplars are drawn from the Americas, Asia, Japan, Korea and Europe to demonstrate the application of the knowledge more broadly.

Results clearly demonstrate that the new models can assist with informed decision-making in adaptation that challenges some of the prevailing solutions based on empirical approaches and which do not accommodate the sustainability dimension. The emphasis is on demonstrating how the new knowledge can be applied by practitioners to deliver professionally relevant outcomes.

The book offers guidance towards a balanced approach that incorporates sustainable and optimal approaches for effective management of sustainable adaptation of existing commercial buildings.


Author Notes

Sara J. Wilkinson is Associate Professor of Property and Construction at the University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
Hilde Remy is Assistant Professor of Real Estate Management at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Craig Langston is Professor of Construction and Facilities Management at Bond University, Queensland, Australia


Table of Contents

Sara J. WilkinsonHilde RemøyCraig Langston
About the Authorsp. xi
Prefacep. xiii
Part I Building Adaptationp. 1
Chapter 1 Defining Adaptationp. 3
1.1 Introductionp. 3
1.2 Terminologyp. 4
1.3 The Significance of Building Adaptationp. 4
1.4 Decision-Making Issues in Building Adaptationp. 10
1.5 Decision Options and Levels of Adaptationp. 11
1.6 Adaptation and Different Land Usesp. 13
1.7 Conclusionp. 14
Referencesp. 15
Chapter 2 Drivers and Barriers for Adaptationp. 18
2.1 Introductionp. 18
2.2 Building Life Cycle Theoryp. 18
2.3 Building Performance Theoryp. 20
2.4 Building Adaptation Theory and Sustainabilityp. 21
2.4.1 Social Factorsp. 22
2.4.2 Environmental Factorsp. 27
2.4.3 Cost and Economic Factorsp. 30
2.5 Other Attributes Associated with Adaptationp. 34
2.5.1 Physical Attributesp. 34
2.5.2 Locational and Land Use Attributesp. 36
2.5.3 Legal Attributesp. 37
2.6 Conclusionp. 38
Referencesp. 39
Chapter 3 Assessing Adaptation Using PAAMp. 42
3.1 Introductionp. 42
3.2 Preliminary Assessmentp. 42
3.3 Principal Component Analysisp. 47
3.4 Preliminary Adaptation Assessment Modelp. 49
3.5 Illustrative Case Studyp. 54
3.5.1 Building Descriptionp. 54
3.5.2 Assessing a Building for 'Alterations' Adaptationp. 54
3.6 Conclusionp. 56
Referencesp. 58
Chapter 4 Sustainable Adaptation: A Case Study of the Melbourne CBDp. 59
4.1 Introductionp. 59
4.2 The Context for Adaptationp. 59
4.3 Typical Sustainability Measures Used in Commercial Building Adaptationp. 60
4.4 Sustainable Adaptation Case Studiesp. 62
4.4.1 131 Queen Streetp. 62
4.4.2 Alto Hotel (636 Bourke Street)p. 64
4.4.3 247 Flinders Lane (Ross House)p. 66
4.4.4 490 Spencer Streetp. 68
4.4.5 500 Collins Streetp. 70
4.4.6 406 Collins Streetp. 73
4.4.7 182 Capel Streetp. 75
4.4.8 115 Batman Streetp. 77
4.4.9 385 Bourke Streetp. 79
4.4.10 530 Collins Streetp. 81
4.5 Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Adaptation Measuresp. 82
4.5.1 Ownersp. 83
4.5.2 Agep. 83
4.5.3 Locationp. 84
4.5.4 Aestheticsp. 85
4.5.5 Location of Vertical Servicesp. 85
4.5.6 Existing Land Usep. 85
4.5.7 Floor Areap. 86
4.5.8 Street Frontagep. 86
4.5.9 Historic Listingp. 86
4.5.10 Number of Storeysp. 87
4.5.11 PCA Gradep. 87
4.5.12 Attachment to Other Buildingsp. 88
4.5.13 Site Accessp. 88
4.6 Conclusionp. 89
Referencesp. 90
Part II Adaptive Reusep. 93
Chapter 5 Building Obsolescence and Reusep. 95
5.1 Introductionp. 95
5.2 Conversion Research Worldwidep. 97
5.3 Building Lifespan and Obsolescencep. 100
5.3.1 Technical Lifespanp. 100
5.3.2 Functional Lifespanp. 101
5.3.3 Economic Lifespanp. 101
5.4 Obsolescence and Vacancyp. 102
5.5 Quality and Obsolescence: User-Based Property Assessmentp. 104
5.6 The Physical Characteristics of Structurally Vacant Office Buildingsp. 106
5.6.1 Structure and Floorsp. 107
5.6.2 Floor Layout, Building Length and Depthp. 107
5.6.3 Facadep. 108
5.6.4 Stairs and Elevatorsp. 108
5.6.5 Location Characteristicsp. 108
5.7 Selected Adaptive Reuse Projectsp. 109
5.8 Conclusionp. 117
Referencesp. 118
Chapter 6 Reuse versus Demolitionp. 121
6.1 Introductionp. 121
6.2 Decision-Making Criteriap. 122
6.3 Tools, Scans and Instrumentsp. 123
6.3.1 The Transformation Meterp. 124
6.3.2 Programmatic Quick Scanp. 127
6.3.3 Architectural Valuep. 127
6.3.4 The Architects' Methodp. 128
6.3.5 The ABT Method: An Instrument Developed in Practicep. 128
6.4 Decisions-Based on Financial Argumentsp. 129
6.5 Durability and Sustainabilityp. 131
6.6 Conclusionp. 132
Referencesp. 133
Chapter 7 Examples of Successful Adaptive Reusep. 135
7.1 Introductionp. 135
7.2 Dutch Conversion Projects (Office to Residential)p. 136
7.2.1 'Stadhouder' in Alphen aan den Rijnp. 137
7.2.2 'Lodewijk Staete' in Appingedamp. 137
7.2.3 'Enka' in Arnhemp. 138
7.2.4 'Schuttersveld' in Delftp. 139
7.2.5 'Westplantsoen' in Delftp. 139
7.2.6 'Wilhelminastaete' in Diemenp. 140
7.2.7 'Granida' in Eindhovenp. 141
7.2.8 'Residentie de Deel' in Emmeloordp. 141
7.2.9 'Twentec' in Enschedep. 142
7.2.10 'Eendrachtskade' in Groningenp. 143
7.2.11 'Billiton' in Den Haagp. 143
7.2.12 'Hof ter Hage' in Den Haagp. 144
7.2.13 'Churchill Towers' in Rijswijkp. 145
7.2.14 'Puntegale' in Rotterdamp. 145
7.2.15 Westerlaan Tower in Rotterdamp. 146
7.3 Discussionp. 147
7.3.1 Data Analysisp. 147
7.3.2 Conversion Risksp. 147
7.3.3 Conversion Opportunitiesp. 150
7.3.4 Typologyp. 152
7.3.5 Structure and Floorsp. 152
7.3.6 Floor Layout, Building Length and Depthp. 153
7.3.7 Facadep. 153
7.3.8 Stairs and Elevatorsp. 154
7.3.9 Locationp. 154
7.3.10 Buildingp. 155
7.4 Conclusionp. 157
Referencesp. 158
Chapter 8 Preserving Cultural and Heritage Valuep. 159
8.1 Introductionp. 159
8.2 Historic Heritagep. 159
8.3 The Value of Heritagep. 160
8.3.1 The Value of Placep. 160
8.3.2 Cultural Capitalp. 161
8.3.3 Benefits of Heritage Conservationp. 162
8.4 Assessing Economic Value of Heritagep. 163
8.4.1 The Market Value of Heritagep. 163
8.4.2 Direct Market Valuep. 164
8.4.3 Indirect Valuep. 164
8.4.4 Indirect Value of Heritage Tourismp. 165
8.4.5 Heritage as a Source of Skills and Competenciesp. 165
8.4.6 Private/Public Valuep. 166
8.5 Heritage Value and Adaptationp. 166
8.6 Architectonic and Aesthetic Valuep. 167
8.7 Experience Valuep. 170
8.7.1 Familiar Uglinessp. 170
8.7.2 Cultural-Historical Valuep. 170
8.7.3 Symbolic Valuep. 171
8.7.4 Traumatic Experience Valuep. 173
8.7.5 Value in Usep. 174
8.7.6 Intrinsic Value (Highest and Best Use)p. 174
8.7.7 Heritage as a Source of Social Valuep. 176
8.8 Conclusionp. 180
Referencesp. 181
Part III Adaptation Decision-Making and Optimisationp. 183
Chapter 9 Identifying Adaptive Reuse Potentialp. 187
9.1 Introductionp. 187
9.2 ARP Modelp. 188
9.3 Obsolescence Ratesp. 191
9.3.1 Physical Obsolescencep. 191
9.3.2 Economic Obsolescencep. 192
9.3.3 Functional Obsolescencep. 193
9.3.4 Technological Obsolescencep. 194
9.3.5 Social Obsolescencep. 194
9.3.6 Legal Obsolescencep. 195
9.3.7 Political Obsolescencep. 196
9.4 Case Study: GPO Building, Melbournep. 197
9.5 Discussionp. 201
9.6 Conclusionp. 205
Notep. 206
Referencesp. 206
Chapter 10 MCDA and Assessing Sustainabilityp. 208
10.1 Introductionp. 208
10.2 Backgroundp. 209
10.3 A New Approachp. 211
10.3.1 Conceptual Frameworkp. 211
10.3.2 Value for Moneyp. 213
10.3.3 Quality of Lifep. 214
10.3.4 Sustainability Riskp. 215
10.4 Life-Cost Planningp. 215
10.5 Case Study: Bond University Mirvac School of Sustainable Development (MSSD) Building, Gold Coastp. 217
10.5.1 Methodp. 217
10.5.2 Return on Investmentp. 218
10.5.3 Energy Usagep. 220
10.5.4 Functional Performancep. 220
10.5.5 Loss of Habitatp. 221
10.5.6 Sustainability Indexp. 221
10.6 Discussionp. 223
10.7 Conclusionp. 227
Notesp. 227
Referencesp. 228
Chapter 11 Modelling Building Performance Using iconCURp. 230
11.1 Introductionp. 230
11.2 Visual MCDAp. 231
11.3 iconCUR Modelp. 232
11.4 Case Study: 88 George Street, Sydneyp. 235
11.4.1 Overviewp. 235
11.4.2 Before Interventionp. 237
11.4.3 After Interventionp. 239
11.5 Discussionp. 241
11.6 Conclusionp. 247
Notesp. 247
Referencesp. 248
Chapter 12 Designing for Future Adaptive Reusep. 250
12.1 Introductionp. 250
12.2 Rationalep. 251
12.3 AdaptSTAR Frameworkp. 254
12.4 International Case Studiesp. 259
12.4.1 1881 Heritage, Hong Kong SAR (PRC)p. 261
12.4.2 Peranakan Museum, City Hall (Singapore)p. 261
12.4.3 Corso Karlín, Prague (Czech Republic)p. 262
12.4.4 Arsenal de Metz, Metz (France)p. 262
12.4.5 The Candy Factory Lofts, Toronto (Canada)p. 263
12.4.6 Punta Delia Dogana Contemporary Art Centre, Venice (Italy)p. 263
12.4.7 Andel's Hotel, Lódz (Poland)p. 264
12.4.8 Sugar Warehouse Loft, Amsterdam (The Netherlands)p. 264
12.4.9 The Powerhouse, Long Island City (USA)p. 265
12.4.10 John Knox Church, Melbourne (Australia)p. 265
12.5 Discussionp. 266
12.6 Conclusionp. 268
Referencesp. 268
Indexp. 273
Go to:Top of Page