Skip to:Content
|
Bottom
Cover image for Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010210697 TD194.6 P82 2008 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Federal agencies have taken steps to include the public in a wide range of environmental decisions. Although some form of public participation is often required by law, agencies usually have broad discretion about the extent of that involvement. Approaches vary widely, from holding public information-gathering meetings to forming advisory groups to actively including citizens in making and implementing decisions.

Proponents of public participation argue that those who must live with the outcome of an environmental decision should have some influence on it. Critics maintain that public participation slows decision making and can lower its quality by including people unfamiliar with the science involved.

This book concludes that, when done correctly, public participation improves the quality of federal agencies' decisions about the environment. Well-managed public involvement also increases the legitimacy of decisions in the eyes of those affected by them, which makes it more likely that the decisions will be implemented effectively. This book recommends that agencies recognize public participation as valuable to their objectives, not just as a formality required by the law. It details principles and approaches agencies can use to successfully involve the public.


Table of Contents

Executive Summaryp. 1
1 Introductionp. 7
Defining Public Participationp. 11
Dimensions of Participationp. 14
Objectives and Scope of the Studyp. 18
Sources of Knowledgep. 21
How We Conducted the Studyp. 27
Guide to the Reportp. 29
Notesp. 30
2 The Promise and Perils of Participationp. 33
Historical Development: Laws and Agency Practicesp. 36
Purposes of Public Participationp. 43
Justifications for and Problems with Public Participationp. 46
Pitfallsp. 51
Criteria for Evaluationp. 66
Conclusionp. 73
Notesp. 74
3 The Effects of Public Participationp. 75
Does Public Participation Improve Results?p. 76
Associations Among Results: Can You Have It All?p. 86
Conclusionp. 91
Notesp. 92
4 Public Participation Practice: Management Practicesp. 95
Clarity of Purposep. 96
Agency Commitmentp. 99
Adequate Capacity and Resourcesp. 101
Timeliness in Relation to Decisionsp. 103
A Focus on Implementationp. 105
Commitment to Learningp. 106
Conclusionp. 109
5 Practice: Organizing Participationp. 111
Public Participation Formats and Practicesp. 111
Dimensions of Participatory Processp. 115
Breadthp. 118
Openness of Designp. 122
Intensityp. 126
Influencep. 132
Conclusionp. 135
Notep. 135
6 Practice: Integrating Sciencep. 137
Integrationp. 138
Challenges of Integrationp. 140
Meeting the Challengesp. 144
Conclusionp. 152
Summary: The Practice of Participationp. 154
7 Context: The Issuep. 157
Purpose of the Process: Assessment or Decision Makingp. 158
Nature of the Environmental Issuep. 161
The Sciencep. 167
Conclusionsp. 180
Notesp. 182
8 Context: The Peoplep. 187
Convening and Implementing Agenciesp. 187
Who Participatesp. 192
Adequacy of Representationp. 193
Differing Perspectivesp. 202
Polarizationp. 205
Power Disparitiesp. 207
Role of Representativesp. 209
Trustp. 210
Conclusionsp. 214
Notesp. 216
9 Overall Conclusions and Recommendationsp. 223
The Value of Public Participationp. 226
Managementp. 227
Organizing the Processp. 230
Integrating Sciencep. 233
Implementationp. 236
Needed Researchp. 238
Notesp. 243
Referencesp. 245
Appendix Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staffp. 299
Go to:Top of Page