Skip to:Content
|
Bottom
Cover image for Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis
Title:
Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis
Series:
A CCPS concept book

CCPS concept book.
Publication Information:
Arlington, Va. : American Chemistry Council ; New York : Center for Chemical Process Safety, c2000
Physical Description:
xxviii, 74 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9780816907465

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000004507202 TP155.5 A68 2000 Open Access Book Book
Searching...
Searching...
30000010245294 TP155.5 A68 2000 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Quantitative Risk Analysis is a powerful tool used to help manage risk and improve safety. When used appropriately, it provides a rational basis for evaluating process safety and comparing alternative safety improvements. This guide, an update of an earlier American Chemistry Council (ACC) publication utilizing the "hands-on" experience of CPI risk assessment practitioners and safety professionals involved with the CCPS and ACC, explains how managers and users can make better-informed decisions about QRA, and how plant engineers and process designers can better understand, interpret and use the results of a QRA in their plant.


Author Notes

J. S. Arendt is the author of Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis, published by Wiley.

D K. Lorenzo is the author of Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis, published by Wiley.


Table of Contents

List of Figuresp. ix
List of Tablesp. xi
Prefacep. xiii
Acknowledgmentsp. xv
Executive Summaryp. xvii
Advice for the Readerp. xxi
Acronymsp. xxiii
Glossaryp. xxv
1 Introductionp. 1
1.1. Backgroundp. 1
1.2. The Process of Risk Analysisp. 2
1.3. Definition of QRAp. 5
1.4. Misconceptions about QRAp. 7
2 Deciding Whether to USE QRAp. 11
2.1. Some Reasons for Considering QRAp. 11
2.2. Types of Information Available from Risk Studiesp. 13
2.3. Criteria for Electing to USE QRAp. 19
3 Management USE of QRAp. 25
3.1. Chartering the Analysisp. 25
3.1.1. Study Objectivep. 26
3.1.2. Scopep. 27
3.1.3. Technical Approachp. 28
3.1.4. Resourcesp. 28
3.2. Selecting QRA Techniquesp. 31
3.2.1. Hazard Identificationp. 31
3.2.2. Consequence Analysisp. 32
3.2.3. Frequency Analysisp. 36
3.2.4. Risk Evaluation and Presentationp. 41
3.3. Understanding the Assumptions and Limitationsp. 46
3.3.1. Completenessp. 46
3.3.2. Model Validityp. 47
3.3.3. Accuracy/Uncertaintyp. 47
3.3.4. Reproducibilityp. 48
3.3.5. Inscrutabilityp. 49
4 Using QRA Resultsp. 51
4.1. Comparative Methods for Establishing Perspectivep. 52
4.2. Factors Influencing Risk Perceptionp. 57
4.2.1. Type of Hazardp. 58
4.2.2. Voluntary versus Involuntaryp. 59
4.2.3. Societal versus Individualp. 59
4.2.4. Public versus Employeep. 59
4.2.5. High Consequence/Low Frequency versus Low Consequence/High Frequencyp. 59
4.2.6. Acute versus Latent Effectsp. 60
4.2.7. Familiarityp. 60
4.2.8. Controllabilityp. 60
4.2.9. Age of Exposed Populationp. 60
4.2.10. Distribution of Risk and Benefitp. 61
4.3. Communicating Riskp. 61
4.3.1. Accept and Involve the Public as a Legitimate Partnerp. 61
4.3.2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Your Effortsp. 61
4.3.3. Listen to People's Specific Concernsp. 62
4.3.4. Be Honest, Frank, and Openp. 62
4.3.5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sourcesp. 62
4.3.6. Meet the Needs of the Mediap. 62
4.3.7. Speak Clearly and with Compassionp. 63
4.4. Pitfalls in Using QRA Resultsp. 63
5 Conclusionp. 65
Referencesp. 67
Suggested Additional Readingp. 73
Go to:Top of Page