Available:*
Library | Item Barcode | Call Number | Material Type | Item Category 1 | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Searching... | 30000010210483 | TC409 W374 2002 | Open Access Book | Book | Searching... |
On Order
Summary
Summary
Watershed Health Monitoring: Emerging Technologies is a concise reference that defines the concept of watershed health and explains that monitoring the health of watersheds is a critical precursor to adaptive resource management on a watershed basis. The focus of the text is a clear description of an innovative "Closed Loop" model that specifies four key aspects of successful monitoring programs: political linkages and support, sound scientific assessment techniques, a community education and awareness component; and a sustainable cost-recovery framework achieved through partnership.
Divided into two sections, the book begins with an introduction that defines watershed health, explains how monitoring fits into watershed planning and management, describes frequent shortfalls of monitoring programs around the world (with an emphasis on North America) and proposes a "Closed Loop" approach that will help ensure successful programs. Subsequent chapters detail each component of the "Closed Loop" model with special emphasis on scientific assessment. The second part features a set of six case studies that describe successful real-world applications of the "Closed Loop" approach to watershed monitoring.
Written in an easily understood manner with the practitioner in mind, Watershed Health Monitoring balances the need for a detailed yet concise treatment of the topic of watershed health monitoring. It is the first book to recognize the multidisciplinary nature of successful monitoring programs-programs that go far beyond science.
Author Notes
Jones, Chris; Palmer, R. Mark; Motkaluk, Susan; Walters, Michael
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction | |
1.1 Problem statement | p. 3 |
1.2 Background | p. 5 |
1.3 Objective and format | p. 6 |
1.4 Definition of watershed health | p. 6 |
1.5 The foundation of watershed management: A lead group and a plan | p. 7 |
1.5.1 The watershed plan | p. 8 |
1.5.2 The watershed management model | p. 10 |
1.6 The Closed-Loop Watershed Health Monitoring Model | p. 11 |
Chapter 2 Political linkages and support | |
2.1 Rationale | p. 15 |
2.2 Creating political linkages | p. 18 |
2.3 Avoiding pitfalls | p. 20 |
Chapter 3 Scientific assessments | |
3.1 Rationale | p. 27 |
3.2 Surveillance and performance evaluation | p. 28 |
3.3 The three-tiered surface water assessment model | p. 28 |
3.3.1 Model assumptions | p. 30 |
3.3.2 Tier 1: Biological assessment approaches | p. 33 |
3.3.2.1 Univariate approaches | p. 35 |
3.3.2.2 Multivariate statistics and the reference condition approach | p. 38 |
3.3.3 Tier 2: Water chemistry and habitat assessment | p. 39 |
3.3.3.1 Water chemistry approaches | p. 40 |
3.3.3.2 Habitat surveys | p. 41 |
3.3.4 Tier 3: Toxic contaminant sampling | p. 44 |
3.3.4.1 Common toxic contaminants in surface waters | p. 44 |
3.3.4.2 Contaminant sampling issues and techniques | p. 45 |
3.3.4.3 Multiple regression, a correlative and predictive tool | p. 50 |
3.4 Data quality assurance and control | p. 52 |
3.5 GIS and modeling tools | p. 55 |
Chapter 4 Community education and awareness | |
4.1 Rationale | p. 61 |
4.2 Techniques for educating the watershed community | p. 62 |
4.2.1 Community-based monitoring | p. 62 |
4.2.2 Seminars and workshops | p. 62 |
4.2.3 Field trips | p. 63 |
4.2.4 Media coverage, marketing, and promotion | p. 64 |
4.2.5 School curriculum | p. 65 |
4.2.6 Utilization of community organizations and service groups | p. 65 |
4.2.7 Computers and the Internet | p. 66 |
4.3 Avoiding pitfalls | p. 66 |
Chapter 5 Cost recovery through partnership | |
5.1 Rationale | p. 71 |
5.2 A cost recovery and partnering model | p. 71 |
5.3 Guiding principles | p. 74 |
Case Study 1 The Laurel Creek Watershed Monitoring Program | |
CS1.1 Background | p. 82 |
CS1.2 Mission statement | p. 82 |
CS1.3 Program objectives | p. 83 |
CS1.4 Program development | p. 85 |
CS1.4.1 Initial stages | p. 85 |
CS1.4.2 Task team development and partnerships | p. 85 |
CS1.5 Pilot study | p. 86 |
CS1.5.1 Purpose | p. 86 |
CS1.5.2 Data collection | p. 86 |
CS1.5.3 Statistical analysis | p. 86 |
CS1.5.4 Results | p. 86 |
CS1.6 The program | p. 86 |
CS1.6.1 System monitoring (watershed-wide area) | p. 87 |
CS1.6.2 Development monitoring (development-specific area) | p. 87 |
CS1.6.2.1 Stage I monitoring (preconstruction) | p. 88 |
CS1.6.2.2 Stage II monitoring (during construction) | p. 89 |
CS1.6.2.3 Stage III monitoring (postconstruction) | p. 89 |
CS1.6.2.4 Postdevelopment monitoring (watershed-wide area) | p. 90 |
CS1.7 Estimated annual program budget | p. 90 |
CS1.8 Recent program development | p. 91 |
CS1.9 Summary and conclusions | p. 91 |
CS1.10 Supporting watershed documents | p. 92 |
CS1.10.1 The Laurel Creek Watershed Study | p. 92 |
CS1.10.2 Regional policy | p. 92 |
CS1.10.3 Municipal policy | p. 93 |
CS1.10.4 District plan | p. 94 |
CS1.11 Winning the 1998 Dubai International Award for Best Practices | p. 94 |
CS1.12 Long-term goals | p. 95 |
Case Study 2 Developing an environmental monitoring program for the Uxbridge Brook Watershed | |
CS2.1 Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan | p. 99 |
CS2.2 Monitoring activities used to develop the Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan | p. 103 |
CS2.3 Monitoring implementation of the Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan | p. 110 |
CS2.3.1 Surveillance monitoring activities | p. 112 |
CS2.3.2 Performance monitoring | p. 113 |
CS2.3.3 Cost recovery, data management, and communication | p. 114 |
Case Study 3 Integrated Stormwater and Watershed Management System--An emerging tool for watershed health planning and monitoring | |
CS3.1 Introduction | p. 119 |
CS3.2 Developing subwatershed plans and monitoring programs using the Integrated Stormwater and Watershed Management System | p. 123 |
CS3.2.1 Objectives and case study locations | p. 123 |
CS3.2.2 Overview of ISWMS software | p. 125 |
CS3.2.3 Applying ISWMS in the Blue Mountain and Beaver Valley region, Ontario | p. 130 |
CS3.2.3.1 Watershed management and flood forecasting | p. 131 |
CS3.2.3.2 Groundwater management and water balance monitoring | p. 132 |
CS3.3 Conclusions | p. 134 |
CS3.4 Case study project participants | p. 135 |
Case Study 4 Advanced remote sensing technologies for watershed health monitoring | |
CS4.1 Introduction | p. 139 |
CS4.2 Recent advances in remote sensing | p. 141 |
CS4.3 Use of radar satellite data for watershed health monitoring | p. 141 |
CS4.3.1 Overview | p. 141 |
CS4.3.2 Location of pilot project watershed | p. 143 |
CS4.3.3 Methodology | p. 145 |
CS4.3.4 Conclusions | p. 145 |
CS4.4 Use of LIDAR data for watershed health monitoring | p. 147 |
CS4.4.1 Overview | p. 147 |
CS4.4.2 The Foster Creek LIDAR Pilot Project | p. 149 |
CS4.4.2.1 Methodology | p. 151 |
CS4.4.2.2 Conclusions | p. 151 |
CS4.5 Case study project partners | p. 153 |
Case Study 5 The Lake Simcoe environmental management strategy | |
CS5.1 Background | p. 157 |
CS5.2 Political support | p. 158 |
CS5.3 Scientific assessment | p. 162 |
CS5.3.1 Open-lake monitoring | p. 163 |
CS5.3.2 Tributary monitoring | p. 164 |
CS5.3.3 Lake Simcoe Fisheries Assessment Unit | p. 166 |
CS5.4 Defining the problem | p. 166 |
CS5.4.1 Developing a phosphorus-loading objective | p. 167 |
CS5.5 Producing a management strategy | p. 169 |
CS5.5.1 Examples of adaptive management in the LSEMS Implementation Program | p. 171 |
CS5.5.2 Assessing the effectiveness of remedial efforts | p. 173 |
CS5.6 Community education and awareness | p. 174 |
CS5.7 Cost recovery and partnerships | p. 176 |
CS5.8 Conclusion | p. 178 |
Case Study 6 Applying the Closed-Loop Model to improve water quality in the Yuqiao Reservoir, Tianjin, China | |
CS6.1 Summary | p. 181 |
CS6.2 Introduction | p. 181 |
CS6.3 The public-participatory process: A means to building consensus | p. 182 |
CS6.3.1 Identifying the problem | p. 183 |
CS6.3.2 Developing the project goal and objective | p. 183 |
CS6.3.3 Defining the study area and pilot projects | p. 183 |
CS6.3.4 Identifying objectives for involving the public | p. 184 |
CS6.3.5 Obstacles and benefits of using a public-participatory approach to control pollution | p. 184 |
CS6.3.6 Identifying the stakeholders | p. 185 |
CS6.3.7 Outlining methods of public participation | p. 186 |
CS6.3.8 Producing a public-participation action plan | p. 186 |
CS6.4 Achieving success: Putting the plans into action | p. 187 |
CS6.5 Lessons learned and the continued application of the public-participation process in China | p. 189 |
Glossary | p. 193 |
References | p. 203 |
Index | p. 215 |