Available:*
Library | Item Barcode | Call Number | Material Type | Item Category 1 | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Searching... | 30000010157058 | KJC5144.M56 M33 2006 | Open Access Book | Book | Searching... |
On Order
Summary
Summary
The debate on multiculturalism and human rights in Europe was reignited in 2004 by the Islamic headscarf ban in France. The legal and political tensions thrown up by this debate are now being witnessed in many European states. The place of religion in schools in general, and wearing of religious dress in State schools in particular, has become an issue across Europe. Supporters of the right to wear the Islamic headscarf argue that the ban and similar prohibitions infringe a number of human rights. This book examines the issues by considering questions of language, meaning and symbolism. In doing so it identifies the debates behind the debates. Detailed consideration is given to the headscarf debate in France. Comparative practice in a number of European states - Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Turkey - is examined. Brief consideration is also given to a number of non-European states. The book also outlines the role and function of an international human rights law approach to the Islamic headscarf. It concludes with some wider reflections on the broader political and cultural struggles that lie behind the Islamic headscarf debate. This wider frame of analysis reveals the deeper significance of the Islamic headscarf bans.
Author Notes
Dominic McGoldrick is Professor of Public International Law and Director of the International and European Law Unit, Liverpool Law School, University of Liverpool.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments | p. vii |
Table of Cases | p. xv |
Introduction | p. 1 |
1 Human Rights and Religion: the Challenge of the Islamic Headscarf-Hijab | p. 4 |
Introduction | p. 4 |
The Headscarf-Hijab: Language, Meaning and Significance | p. 4 |
The Headscarf-Hijab as a Religious Obligation? | p. 8 |
The Real Debates Behind the Debates on the Headscarf-Hijab | p. 12 |
The Headscarf-Hijab as an Instrument of Oppression of Woman | p. 13 |
The Headscarf-Hijab as a Political Symbol | p. 17 |
The Headscarf-Hijab as Evidence of the Failed Integration of Immigrants | p. 17 |
The Headscarf-Hijab and Terrorism | p. 20 |
Human Rights Perspectives on the Headscarf-Hijab | p. 22 |
Religion and Human Rights | p. 24 |
The Human Right to Freedom of Religion | p. 25 |
Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | p. 26 |
Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights | p. 27 |
The National Assessment and the margin of Appreciation | p. 28 |
Parents and Children | p. 30 |
European Union Standards | p. 30 |
The Role of Human Rights Thinking | p. 31 |
2 The Islamic Headscarf Debate in France | p. 34 |
Introduction | p. 34 |
The Church and State in France | p. 36 |
The Law of 1905 | p. 36 |
Laicite and Secularism | p. 38 |
The French Approach to Rights | p. 41 |
Assimilation and Integration | p. 44 |
France and International Human Rights law | p. 46 |
How France view Muslims | p. 47 |
Muslims in France | p. 52 |
The Wearing of the Headscarf-Hijab in France | p. 61 |
The Headscarf-Hijab Debate in France: l' Affaire du Foulard | p. 64 |
The 1989 Opinion of the Conseil d' Etat | p. 68 |
Cases in the Conseil d'Etat | p. 70 |
The Neutrality of Civil Servants and Teachers | p. 73 |
The School Context | p. 76 |
The Headscarf-Hijab in the Private Sector | p. 80 |
President Chirac's Speech of 16 December 2003 | p. 81 |
The Stasi commission | p. 83 |
The French Law on Headscarves-Hijab of 2004 | p. 90 |
The Application of the New Law | p. 91 |
Reactions to the Ban on the Headscarf-Hijab | p. 96 |
The Law of 2004-Two Years On | p. 100 |
Concluding Comments | p. 101 |
3 Comparative State Practice; Germany | p. 107 |
Introduction | p. 107 |
The Church and State in Germany | p. 107 |
The Muslim Community in Germany | p. 109 |
The Headscarf-Hijab Debate in Germany | p. 110 |
The Ludin Case | p. 111 |
The Minority Judgment in Ludin | p. 114 |
Responses to the Ludin Case | p. 115 |
Concluding Comments | p. 118 |
4 Comparative state Practice: Switzerland | p. 120 |
Church and state in Switzerland | p. 120 |
Muslims in Switzerland | p. 120 |
The Dahlab Case | p. 121 |
The Dehlab Case in the Swiss Federal Court | p. 122 |
The European Court of Human Rights in Dahlab | p. 129 |
Concluding Comments | p. 131 |
5 Comparative state Practice: Turkey | p. 132 |
Introduction | p. 132 |
State and Religion in Turkey | p. 132 |
The Headscarf-Hijab Debate in Turkey | p. 133 |
Turkish Cases Before the European Commission on Human Rights | p. 137 |
Leyla Sahin v Turkey the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights | p. 140 |
The Assessment of the Grand Chamber on Article 9 European Convention on Human Rights Freedom of Religion | p. 150 |
The Assessment of the Grand Chamber of Article 2 of Protocol 1: the Right to Education | p. 157 |
The Assessment of the Grand Chamber on Articles 8 (privacy), 10 (expression) and 14 (non-discrimination) | p. 159 |
The Dissent of judge Tulkens' in the Grand Chamber | p. 159 |
The Significance of the Decision in Leyla Sahin v Turkey | p. 167 |
The Advocacy of Islamic Headscarves-Hijab in Turkish Politics | p. 169 |
Concluding Comments | p. 171 |
6 Comparative State Practice United Kingdom | p. 173 |
Introduction | p. 173 |
State and Church in the United Kingdom | p. 173 |
Muslims in the United Kingdom | p. 174 |
Muslims and School Uniforms in England and Wales | p. 176 |
The Begum Case in the High Court | p. 180 |
The Begum Case in the Court of Appeal | p. 184 |
The Begum Case in the House of Lords | p. 190 |
Conduding Comments | p. 203 |
7 Comparative State Proactive Spain, Italy, Belgium the Netherlands, and Other European States | p. 205 |
Spain | p. 205 |
Italy | p. 206 |
Belgium | p. 210 |
The Netherlands | p. 212 |
Other European States | p. 214 |
Concluding Comments | p. 218 |
8 Comparative State Practice; Non-European States | p. 220 |
Introduction | p. 220 |
The United States | p. 220 |
Uzbekistan | p. 225 |
Trinidad | p. 230 |
Afghanistan | p. 232 |
Singapore | p. 233 |
Saudi Arabia | p. 233 |
Iran | p. 234 |
Concluding Comments | p. 236 |
9 Applying International Human Rights Standards to the Headscarf-Hijab | p. 237 |
Introduction | p. 237 |
Individual Applications to National Courts and International Human Rights Bodies | p. 237 |
Individual and Group Identities and Rights | p. 241 |
Negative and Positive Aspects of a Human Rights | p. 244 |
The Right to Freedom of Religion | p. 246 |
The Human Rights Context of Church-State Relations Under the ECHR | p. 247 |
Limitations on religious freedoms on the basis of the æprotection of public order' and the æprotection of the rights and freedoms of others' | p. 250 |
Religious Discrimination and Islamophobia | p. 252 |
Religious Discrimination and the European Union | p. 257 |
Racial Discrimination | p. 259 |
Gender Discrimination and Feminist Perspectives | p. 261 |
Autonomy and Consent | p. 270 |
Minority Rights and Cultural Rights | p. 275 |
Children's Rights and Parents Rights | p. 276 |
Teachers Rights and Children's Rights | p. 282 |
Concluding Comments | p. 286 |
10 Wider Perspectives on the Headscarf-Hijab | p. 288 |
Introduction | p. 288 |
National Identity | p. 288 |
National Identity and International Human Rights law | p. 289 |
Changing National Identity | p. 294 |
Multiculturalism and Islamophobia | p. 298 |
Secularism Versus Religion | p. 301 |
Secularism and International Human Rights Law | p. 303 |
Secularism and Neutrality | p. 304 |
Liberalism and Religious Education | p. 305 |
Liberalism and Religious Fundamentalism | p. 306 |
Concluding Comments | p. 308 |
Author Index | p. 311 |
Index | p. 317 |