Cover image for Planning theory : from the political debate to the methodological reconstruction
Title:
Planning theory : from the political debate to the methodological reconstruction
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
New York , NY : Springer, 2008
Physical Description:
xi, 125 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9788847006959

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010169256 HT166 A72 2008 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Planning Theory expresses a sound unease about the direction taken by the current analysis and criticism of planning experiences. To oppose the debate that freezes planning as a permanently declining engagement, this book aims to identify the essential guidelines of a re-launch of planning processes and techniques, configuring a kind of neo-discipline. This builds upon a multi-disciplinary integration - never seen and experimented with until now.


Author Notes

Professor of Planning (in several Italian Universities, and lastly at the Postgraduate School of Public Administration, Rome; President of the Planning Studies Centre, Rome).

He has been consultant of many international institutions (UNDP, UNESCO, UN-ECE, UNEP, OECD, European Union, Council of Europe and others) and of the Italian Government.

Author of some books in economics and planning, which have had international audience within the scientific community, like The Associative Economy (Macmillan, 2000), The Ecological City (Ashgate, 1997), Economy and Ecology (co-ed., Kluwer, 1992), and others.


Table of Contents

1 Planning Theory: Reconstruction or Requiem?p. 1
1.1 A Certain Uneasiness about "Planning Theory"p. 1
1.2 Have We Improved the Clarity of Planning Methodology?p. 2
1.3 What Are the Reasons for the Deceiving Development of Planning Theory?p. 4
1.3.1 The Equivocal Case of the "Substantive" Side of Planning Theoryp. 5
1.3.2 Expanding the Scope Too Muchp. 6
1.3.3 Expanding the Terrain and the Rootsp. 8
1.3.4 The Lack of Relationship with "Substantive" Planningp. 10
1.4 Planning Theory: General or Not?p. 11
1.5 A Vade-Mecum for Good Planners' Professional Relations?p. 12
1.6 Deontology and Epistemology of the Professionp. 14
2 In Search of Integration: The Past Negative Experiencep. 17
2.1 Expectations and Results from the Integration of the Planning Sciencesp. 17
2.1.1 Macro-Economic Planning in Europep. 18
2.1.2 Strategic Management and Planning in the Public Sectorp. 19
2.1.3 Integrated Regional Planningp. 19
2.1.4 Integrated Approach in Academic Journalsp. 19
2.2 The Bad Course of the Debatep. 21
2.3 Is a Positive Reconstruction of Planning Theory Possible?p. 22
3 Towards a New Unified Discipline of Planningp. 25
3.1 The Fields of Activityp. 25
3.1.1 Physical Planningp. 25
3.1.2 Macro-Economic Planningp. 26
3.1.3 Social Planningp. 28
3.1.4 Development Planningp. 29
3.1.5 Operational Planningp. 31
3.2 The Merits and Limits of the Trans-Disciplinary Approachp. 34
3.2.1 Meritsp. 34
3.2.2 Limitsp. 35
3.3 "Positivist"-Type Decision-Making Analysisp. 35
3.4 Social Reality is Subjective Realityp. 36
3.5 "Voluntarist"-Type Decision-Making Analysisp. 37
3.6 A Defect of Approach or One of Further Elaboration?p. 38
4 The First Routes of the New Disciplinep. 41
4.1 Schemes of Procedure for the Preparation of Plans and the Construction of Suitable "Accounting Frames"p. 42
4.2 Schemes of the Systemic Interrelationship Between Plan Levelsp. 43
4.3 Institutional Procedures of "Plan Bargaining" and Preference Consultation Systemsp. 44
4.4 Information Systems for Planning and Their Managementp. 45
4.5 Monitoring and Plan Evaluation Systemsp. 46
5 Some Integrative Topics of the New Planning Disciplinep. 47
5.1 Integration Between (Conventional) Economic Accounting Systems and Social Accounting Systemsp. 48
5.2 Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning (and Related Accounting) and Technological Forecastingp. 49
5.3 Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning (and Related Accounting) and Physical (or Territorial or Environmental) Planningp. 50
5.4 Integration Between Socio-Economic (and Physical) Planning and Institutional Organisation and Negotiationp. 50
5.5 Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning and the Institutional System and Designp. 51
5.6 Concluding Remarks: The "Planological Approach"p. 52
6 Planning Science: Basic Postulates and Logical Framework for Referencep. 55
6.1 From Planning "Theory" to Planning "Science"p. 55
6.2 A reference Framework for Planning Science: Some Essential Postulatesp. 56
6.2.1 Logical Postulatesp. 56
6.2.2 Field or Delimitation Postulatesp. 59
6.3 The Planning Processp. 62
6.4 The Planning Systemp. 63
6.4.1 The Planning Selection Systemp. 65
6.4.2 The Planning Implementation Systemp. 68
6.4.3 Functional and Time Interdependenciesp. 70
6.5 Conclusionsp. 72
7 The Future of National Planning Systems: Some New Stepsp. 73
7.1 The Concept of "National Planning"p. 73
7.2 National Planning in a Systemic Visionp. 74
7.3 What Opportunities Exist for the Systemic-Type Development of National Planning?p. 75
7.3.1 The Weight of the Pastp. 75
7.3.2 Strategic Planning at the National Scalep. 77
7.4 The American Federal Strategic Planning: Its Effects on the National Planning Futurep. 79
7.5 From Strategic Planning to National Economic Programming: A Necessary Step Towards Systemic Planningp. 80
7.6 Toward a Scientific and Professional Approach to the Systemic Planningp. 81
8 Planning and Plan Evaluation: Some Well-Known and Often Neglected Pitfallsp. 83
8.1 Logical Indeterminateness: "Evaluation" vs "Values"p. 84
8.2 Systemic Disconnectednessp. 88
8.3 Strategic Insubordinationp. 89
8.4 Self-Referencingp. 90
8.5 Sub-Optimizationp. 92
8.6 Bounded Rationalityp. 92
9 Conclusionsp. 97
9.1 A question of Prepositionsp. 97
9.2 A Question of "Adjectivization"p. 98
9.3 The "Rational" Approach Case and the "Communicative" or "Collaborative" Onep. 100
9.4 The Diagonal of "Planology"p. 102
Bibliographical Referencesp. 105
Authors Indexp. 117
Analytical Indexp. 121