Cover image for Doctoral education and the faculty of the future
Title:
Doctoral education and the faculty of the future
Publication Information:
London : Cornell University Press, 2009
Physical Description:
ix, 308 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9780801445439

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010222782 LB2386 D62 2009 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

American colleges and universities simultaneously face large numbers of faculty retirements and expanding enrollments. Budget constraints have led colleges and universities to substitute part-time and full-time non-tenure-track faculty for tenure-track faculty, and the demand for faculty members will likely be high in the decade ahead.

This heightened demand is coming at a time when the share of American college graduates who go on for PhD study is far below its historic high. The declining interest of American students in doctoral programs is due to many factors, including long completion times, low completion rates, the high cost of doctoral education, and the decline in the share of faculty positions that are tenured or on the tenure track. In short, doctoral education is in crisis because the impediments are many and the rewards are few; students often choose instead to enroll in professional programs that result in more marketable credentials.

In Doctoral Education and the Faculty of the Future , scientists, social scientists, academic administrators, and policy makers describe their efforts to increase and improve the supply of future faculty. They cover topics ranging from increasing undergraduate interest in doctoral study to improving the doctoral experience and the participation of underrepresented groups in doctoral education.


Author Notes

Ronald G. Ehrenberg is Irving M. Ives Professor of Industrial and Labor Relations and Economics, Director of the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, a Cornell University Trustee, and a former Vice President for Academic Programs, Planning, and Budgeting at Cornell. His books include Governing Academia , also from Cornell. Charlotte V. Kuh is Deputy Executive Director of the National Academy of Sciences. She is the author of Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study .


Table of Contents

Ronald G. Ehrenberg and Charlotte V. KuhRonald G. Ehrenberg and Harriet Zuckerman and Jeffrey A. Groen and Sharon M. BruckerDaniel D. Denecke and Helen S. Frasier and Kenneth E. ReddChris M. Golde and Andrea Conklin Bueschel and Laura Jones and George E. WalkerCatherine M. Millett and Michael T. NettlesMaresi NeradRobert J. LemkeMyles BoylanRichard Tapia and Cynthia JohnsonCarlos Castillo-Chavez and Carlos Castillo-GarsowCharles Becker and Gregory PriceCheryl Leggon and Willie Pearson Jr.M. R. C. GreenwoodJong-on HahmLinda Abriola and Margery DaviesLiang ZhangEmily Blanchard and John Bound and Sarah TurnerMichael A. OlivasRonald G. Ehrenberg and Charlotte V. Kuh
Introductionp. 1
I Improving Doctoral Education
1 Changing the Education of Scholars: An Introduction to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation's Graduate Education Initiativep. 15
2 The Council of Graduate Schools' PhD Completion Projectp. 35
3 Advocating Apprenticeship and Intellectual Community: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctoratep. 53
4 Three Ways of Winning Doctoral Education: Rate of Progress, Degree Completion, and Time to Degreep. 65
5 Confronting Common Assumptions: Designing Future-Oriented Doctoral Educationp. 80
II Attracting Undergraduates to PhD Study
6 Generating Doctoral Degree Candidates at Liberal Arts Collegesp. 93
7 Undergraduate STEM Research Experiences: Impact on Student Interest in Doing Graduate Work in STEM Fieldsp. 109
III Increasing the Representation of People of Color in the PhD Pool
8 Minority Students in Science and Math: What Universities Still Do Not Understand about Race in Americap. 123
9 The Mathematical and Theoretical Biology Institute: A Successful Model for Increasing Minority Representation in the Mathematical Sciencesp. 135
10 Curriculum Intensity in Graduate Preparatory Programs: The Impact on Performance and Progression to Graduate Study among Minority Students in Economicsp. 146
11 Assessing Programs to Improve Minority Participation in the STEM Fields: What We Know and What We Need to Knowp. 160
IV Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia
12 First a Glass Ceiling, Now a Glass Cliff? The Changing Picture for Women in Science and Higher Education Careersp. 175
13 Increasing Women's Representation in the Life Sciencesp. 182
14 Attracting and Retaining Women in Engineering: The Tufts University Experiencep. 192
V The Internationalization of Doctoral Education
15 Do Foreign Doctorate Recipients Displace U.S. Doctorate Recipients at U.S. Universities?p. 209
16 Opening (and Closing) Doors: Country-Specific Shocks in U.S. Doctoral Educationp. 224
17 What the "War on Terror" Has Meant for U.S. Colleges and Universitiesp. 249
Looking to the Futurep. 259
Notesp. 263
Referencesp. 277
Contributorsp. 293
Author Indexp. 297
Subject Indexp. 301