Cover image for Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots
Title:
Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
Boca Raton, FL : Chapman & Hall, 2009
Physical Description:
xx, 257 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9781420085945
General Note:
A Chapman & Hall book

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010175345 UG479 A74 2009 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Expounding on the results of the author's work with the US Army Research Office, DARPA, the Office of Naval Research, and various defense industry contractors, Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots explores how to produce an "artificial conscience" in a new class of robots, humane-oids, which are robots that can potentially perform more ethically than humans in the battlefield. The author examines the philosophical basis, motivation, theory, and design recommendations for the implementation of an ethical control and reasoning system in autonomous robot systems, taking into account the Laws of War and Rules of Engagement.

The book presents robot architectural design recommendations for

Post facto suppression of unethical behavior, Behavioral design that incorporates ethical constraints from the onset, The use of affective functions as an adaptive component in the event of unethical action, and A mechanism that identifies and advises operators regarding their ultimate responsibility for the deployment of autonomous systems.

It also examines why soldiers fail in battle regarding ethical decisions; discusses the opinions of the public, researchers, policymakers, and military personnel on the use of lethality by autonomous systems; provides examples that illustrate autonomous systems' ethical use of force; and includes relevant Laws of War.

Helping ensure that warfare is conducted justly with the advent of autonomous robots, this book shows that the first steps toward creating robots that not only conform to international law but outperform human soldiers in their ethical capacity are within reach in the future. It supplies the motivation, philosophy, formalisms, representational requirements, architectural design criteria, recommendations, and test scenarios to design and construct an autonomous robotic system capable of ethically using lethal force.

Ron Arkin was quoted in a November 2010 New York Times article about robots in the military.


Table of Contents

Prefacep. xi
Acknowledgmentsp. xix
Chapter 1 Introductionp. 1
Chapter 2 Trends toward Lethalityp. 7
2.1 Weaponized Unmanned Ground Vehiclesp. 10
2.2 Weaponized Unmanned Aerial Vehiclesp. 21
2.3 Prospectsp. 26
Chapter 3 Human Failings in the Battlefieldp. 29
Chapter 4 Related Philosophical Thoughtp. 37
Chapter 5 What People Think: Opinions on Lethal Autonomous Systemsp. 49
5.1 Survey Backgroundp. 50
5.2 Responsep. 51
5.3 Comparative Resultsp. 52
5.4 Discussionp. 55
Chapter 6 Formalization for Ethical Controlp. 57
6.1 Formal Methods for Describing Behaviorp. 58
6.1.1 Range of Responses: Rp. 58
6.1.2 The Stimulus Domain: Sp. 58
6.1.3 The Behavioral Mapping: ßp. 60
6.2 Ethical Behaviorp. 62
Chapter 7 Specific Issues for Lethality: What to Representp. 69
7.1 What Is Requiredp. 70
7.2 Laws of Warp. 71
7.3 Rules of Engagementp. 81
7.3.1 Standing Rules of Engagementp. 82
7.3.2 Rules of Engagement (Non-SROE)p. 84
7.3.3 Rules for the Use of Forcep. 86
7.3.4 ROE for Peace Enforcement Missionsp. 91
Chapter 8 Representational Choices: How to Represent Ethics in a Lethal Robotp. 93
8.1 Underpinningsp. 95
8.2 Generalism-Reasoning from Moral Principlesp. 99
8.2.1 Deontic Logicp. 99
8.2.2 Utilitarian Methodsp. 102
8.2.3 Kantian Rule-Based Methodsp. 103
8.3 Particularism: Case-Based Reasoningp. 104
8.4 Ethical Decision Makingp. 108
Chapter 9 Architectural Considerations for Governing Lethalityp. 115
9.1 Architectural Requirementsp. 119
Chapter 10 Design Optionsp. 125
10.1 Ethical Governorp. 127
10.2 Ethical Behavioral Controlp. 133
10.3 Ethical Adaptorp. 138
10.3.1 After-Action Reflectionp. 138
10.3.2 Affective Restriction of Behaviorp. 140
10.4 Responsibility Advisorp. 143
10.4.1 Command Authorization for a Mission Involving Autonomous Lethal Forcep. 146
10.4.2 Design for Mission Command Authorizationp. 148
10.4.3 The Use of Ethical Overridesp. 149
10.4.4 Design for Overriding Ethical Controlp. 152
Chapter 11 Example Scenarios for the Ethical Use of Forcep. 155
11.1 Taliban Muster in Cemeteryp. 157
11.2 "Apache Rules the Night"p. 162
11.3 Korean Demilitarized Zonep. 167
11.4 Urban Sniperp. 171
Chapter 12 A Prototype Implementationp. 177
12.1 Infrastructurep. 177
12.2 A Prototype Implementation of the Ethical Governorp. 178
12.2.1 Ethical Constraintsp. 179
12.2.2 Evidential Reasoningp. 182
12.2.3 Constraint Applicationp. 182
12.2.4 Proportionality and Battlefield Carnagep. 185
12.2.5 Demonstration Scenario Overviewp. 188
12.2.6 Scenario 1-Suppressing Unethical Behaviorp. 190
12.2.7 Scenario 2-Maintaining Ethical Behavior While Minimizing Collateral Damagep. 192
12.3 Implementing the Responsibility Advisorp. 196
12.3.1 Establishing Responsibility When Tasking an Autonomous System Capable of Lethal Forcep. 196
12.3.2 Run-Time Responsibility Advising and Operator Overridesp. 202
12.3.2.1 Continuous Presentation of the Status of the Ethical Governorp. 203
12.3.2.2 Negative Overrides: Denying Permission to Fire in the Presence of Obligating Constraintsp. 205
12.3.2.3 Positive Overrides: Granting Permission to Fire in the Presence of Forbidding Ethical Constraintsp. 206
12.4 Summaryp. 209
Epiloguep. 211
Referencesp. 213
Appendix A Relevant Laws of Warp. 225
Appendix B Acronymsp. 243
Appendix C Notationp. 245
Indexp. 247