Cover image for Building robust learning environments in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
Title:
Building robust learning environments in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
Series:
New directions for higher education, no. 119
Publication Information:
San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, 2002
ISBN:
9780787963323

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
30000010017851 LB2361.5 B84 2002 Open Access Book Book
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Acknowledging the growing national need for a well-equipped talent pool from which the scientific, technical, and engineering workforce in the twenty-first century will be drawn, this volume examines ways that trustees, presidents, provosts, and deans can commit to national objectives and translate them into action at the local level. It challenges academic leaders to take immediate and informed action to guarantee undergraduate access to programs of the highest quality that prepare them for life and work in the world beyond the campus.

All undergraduates in these early decades of the twenty-first century need access to robust and engaging learning experiences that provide a deep understanding of the nature of science and the scientific process, alert them to the power and potential of science and technology in their world, make them facile with numbers and data and the use of technologies, and prepare them for responsible citizenship in a world dominated by science and technology. All students, no matter what their background, need access to a research-rich, discovery-based learning environment in which they are motivated to consider a career using scientific and technological capabilities, perhaps as a K-12 teacher, an academic scientist or engineer, or in the high-tech industrial community.

This is the 119th issue in the Jossey-Bass higher education series New Directions for Higher Education.


Table of Contents

Editors NotesJeanne L. Narum and Kate Conover
Part 1 Social Demands and Student Needs
1 The National Context for ReformG. Doyle Daves and Jr
Educational cultures must be changed to strengthen the learning of allstudents
2 New Truths and Old VeritiesJudith A. Ramaley
The leaders of educational institutions must work to ensure that undergraduatesgain mastery of the ideas and ways of thinking of science andmathematics
Part 2 The Curriculum and the Sequences of Learning
3 Changing Assumptions About Who Can LearnGeorge Campbell and Jr
We must address our failure as a nation to develop a more diverse cadreof students and to bring them into the natural sciences, mathematics,and engineering professions
4 Science for All AmericansGeorge D. Nelson
This chapter proposes a project to ensure that in ten years, all studentsgraduating from American colleges and universities will be literate inmathematics, science, and technology
5 A Multidisciplinary Core CurriculumTrace Jordan
A major research university has made a strong commitment to generalmathematics and science education for its undergraduate students
It is addressing the educational challenge of mathematical and scientificliteracy for undergraduate students
6 Building Natural Science CommunitiesThomas E. Brady
A community collaborative is formed to ensure academic opportunityand success for a diverse region of the country
Emphasis is placed ona standards-based curriculum, better teacher preparation, and theincreased engagement of leaders, parents, teachers, and faculty from allparts of the community
7 Cognitive Science and the Work of ReformDiane F. Halpern
Research in how people think, learn, and remember can be used as aguide in redesigning higher education
8 Effective Assessment and Institutional ChangeChristine Brooks Cote and Marianne Jordan
The assessment process contributes to keeping teaching ideas fresh andresponsive to student needs
Part 3 Investing in Science Education
9 Investing in Faculty (Project Kaleidoscope, Core Institution Task Force)
Investing in faculty must be an institutional priority
10 Learning and Teaching Centers: Hubs of EducationalReformSusan R. Singer
Learning and teaching centers maximize the forward momentum ofeducational reform
11 Linking Departmental and Institutional MissionJ. K. Haynes
A departmental mission statement frames planning and provides consistent programmatic activities, thereby creating a closer community ofscholars
12 A Perspective on Campus PlanningArthur J. Lidsky
Campus planning is the process of guiding the development of a campusso that it supports functional, aesthetic, and economic goals withinthe context of the institutions history, mission, and vision for thefuture
13 Investing in Digital ResourcesDavid McArthur
Emerging technologies enhance existing methods of learning and createnew ways for institutions of higher education to fulfill their coreteaching and learning missions
Part 4 The Perspectives of Leadership
14 The Variables of Positive ChangeDaniel F. Sullivan
A strategy for systemic reform must involve faculty innovators and administrative leaders working together
15 The Role of the Grants OfficerLee W. Willard
Grants officers have a central role to play in promoting institutional progress
16 The Role of the Science DeanJames M. Gentile
One colleges science dean is a campus and divisional leader who helpsfaculty to frame programs that suit institutional and disciplinary needsand is a key advocate for those programs inside and external to the institution
17 Fund Development for Science FacilitiesJames R. Appleton
A president shares his wisdom on the critical elements of a capital campaignprogram
18 The People and Process of Investing in FacilitiesElizab