Cover image for Information processing in medical imaging 20th international conference, IPMI 2007, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, July 2-6, 2007 : proceedings
Title:
Information processing in medical imaging 20th international conference, IPMI 2007, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, July 2-6, 2007 : proceedings
Series:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4584
Publication Information:
Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
Physical Description:
xx, 777 p. : ill., digital ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9783540732730
General Note:
Available in online version
Added Corporate Author:
Electronic Access:
Full Text
DSP_RESTRICTION_NOTE:
Remote access restricted to users with a valid UTM ID via VPN

Available:*

Library
Item Barcode
Call Number
Material Type
Item Category 1
Status
Searching...
EB000182 EB 000182 Electronic Book 1:EBOOK
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

The 20th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Im- ing(IPMI)washeldduringJuly2-6,2007,atRolducAbbey,locatedinKerkrade in the south of the Netherlands. Following the highly successful IPMI in Gl- wood Springs in the Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA (2005), the conference was the latest in a series of biennial scienti?c meetings where new developments in acquisition, analysis, and use of medical images are presented. IPMI is one of the longest running conferences in medical imaging. It was started in 1969 by a group of young scientists working in nuclear medicine. With a few iterations the conference expanded to other areas and became established as an important meeting for in-depth discussion of new methodological developments in me- cal imaging. Nowadays it is widely recognized as one of the most exciting and in?uential conferences in its ?eld. At IPMI meetings a wide variety of topics are covered by a relatively small selection of papers presented in single-track sessions. This year, there were 210 manuscripts submitted to the conference. Of these papers, 26 were accepted for oral presentation, and 37 papers were accepted as posters. Papers were ca- fully judged by three reviewers and two paper selection committee members, with emphasis on originality, methodological development, scienti?c rigor, and relevance. Selection of papers was di?cult, but using the rankings and detailed comments of the reviewerswe wereable to makea greatselectionin anobjective way. Unfortunately, due to the large number of submissions, it was inevitable that many high-quality papers did not make it into the ?nal program.